imaging filter gif continuum spectrometer Search Results


99
Revvity ivis spectrum
Ivis Spectrum, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ivis spectrum/product/Revvity
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ivis spectrum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Gatan Inc energy dispersive x ray spectrometer
Energy Dispersive X Ray Spectrometer, supplied by Gatan Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/energy dispersive x ray spectrometer/product/Gatan Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
energy dispersive x ray spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Santa Cruz Biotechnology f 12 pol ii antibody
Fig. 1 | Structure of the <t>Pol</t> <t>II–TCR</t> complex. a, Cryo-EM density (left) and ribbon model (right) of the Pol II–CSB–CSA–DDB1–UVSSA complex. The scheme depicts the domain composition and colour code for proteins. The solid black lines mark residues included in the model.
F 12 Pol Ii Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/f 12 pol ii antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
f 12 pol ii antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher nexsa spectrometer
Fig. 1 | Structure of the <t>Pol</t> <t>II–TCR</t> complex. a, Cryo-EM density (left) and ribbon model (right) of the Pol II–CSB–CSA–DDB1–UVSSA complex. The scheme depicts the domain composition and colour code for proteins. The solid black lines mark residues included in the model.
Nexsa Spectrometer, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nexsa spectrometer/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nexsa spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio-Rad image lab v5 2 1
Fig. 1 | Structure of the <t>Pol</t> <t>II–TCR</t> complex. a, Cryo-EM density (left) and ribbon model (right) of the Pol II–CSB–CSA–DDB1–UVSSA complex. The scheme depicts the domain composition and colour code for proteins. The solid black lines mark residues included in the model.
Image Lab V5 2 1, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/image lab v5 2 1/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
image lab v5 2 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Bio-Rad bio rad chemidoc imaging system
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Bio Rad Chemidoc Imaging System, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bio rad chemidoc imaging system/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bio rad chemidoc imaging system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Bruker Corporation 7 t spectrometer
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
7 T Spectrometer, supplied by Bruker Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/7 t spectrometer/product/Bruker Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
7 t spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Oxford Instruments imaging spectrometer
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Imaging Spectrometer, supplied by Oxford Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imaging spectrometer/product/Oxford Instruments
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imaging spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Revvity spectrum 100 ft ir spectrometer
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Spectrum 100 Ft Ir Spectrometer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spectrum 100 ft ir spectrometer/product/Revvity
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spectrum 100 ft ir spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Gatan Inc electron energy loss spectrometer
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Electron Energy Loss Spectrometer, supplied by Gatan Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/electron energy loss spectrometer/product/Gatan Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
electron energy loss spectrometer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Specim Spectral Imaging spectrometer v10e
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Spectrometer V10e, supplied by Specim Spectral Imaging, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spectrometer v10e/product/Specim Spectral Imaging
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spectrometer v10e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Evident Corporation al 79
Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by <t>Bio-Rad</t> imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.
Al 79, supplied by Evident Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/al 79/product/Evident Corporation
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
al 79 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 1 | Structure of the Pol II–TCR complex. a, Cryo-EM density (left) and ribbon model (right) of the Pol II–CSB–CSA–DDB1–UVSSA complex. The scheme depicts the domain composition and colour code for proteins. The solid black lines mark residues included in the model.

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Structural basis of human transcription-DNA repair coupling.

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03906-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 | Structure of the Pol II–TCR complex. a, Cryo-EM density (left) and ribbon model (right) of the Pol II–CSB–CSA–DDB1–UVSSA complex. The scheme depicts the domain composition and colour code for proteins. The solid black lines mark residues included in the model.

Article Snippet: Materials & experimental systems n/a Involved in the study Antibodies Eukaryotic cell lines Palaeontology and archaeology Animals and other organisms Human research participants Clinical data Dual use research of concern Methods n/a Involved in the study ChIP-seq Flow cytometry MRI-based neuroimaging Antibodies Antibodies used F-12 Pol II antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-55492; anti-mouse HRP conjugate, Abcam, ab5870 Validation Mouse monoclonal antibody to RNA polymerase II subunit A.

Techniques: Cryo-EM Sample Prep

Fig. 2 | Formation and structure of ECTCR. a, Electrophoretic mobility shift assay monitors replacement of DSIF by CSB on the Pol II elongation complex. The gel was scanned in three different channels to reveal the elongation complex (via DNA), DSIF and CSB through different fluorescent labels. The experiment was repeated three times. Asterisks indicate the attachment of

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Structural basis of human transcription-DNA repair coupling.

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03906-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 | Formation and structure of ECTCR. a, Electrophoretic mobility shift assay monitors replacement of DSIF by CSB on the Pol II elongation complex. The gel was scanned in three different channels to reveal the elongation complex (via DNA), DSIF and CSB through different fluorescent labels. The experiment was repeated three times. Asterisks indicate the attachment of

Article Snippet: Materials & experimental systems n/a Involved in the study Antibodies Eukaryotic cell lines Palaeontology and archaeology Animals and other organisms Human research participants Clinical data Dual use research of concern Methods n/a Involved in the study ChIP-seq Flow cytometry MRI-based neuroimaging Antibodies Antibodies used F-12 Pol II antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-55492; anti-mouse HRP conjugate, Abcam, ab5870 Validation Mouse monoclonal antibody to RNA polymerase II subunit A.

Techniques: Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

Fig. 3 | Complete Pol II–TCR complex and ubiquitylation by CRL4CSA. a, In vitro ubiquitylation of the complete Pol II–TCR complex by CRL4CSA. The experiment was repeated two times. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. b, Tandem mass spectrometry fragment spectrum of the RPB1 peptide

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Structural basis of human transcription-DNA repair coupling.

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03906-4

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 | Complete Pol II–TCR complex and ubiquitylation by CRL4CSA. a, In vitro ubiquitylation of the complete Pol II–TCR complex by CRL4CSA. The experiment was repeated two times. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. b, Tandem mass spectrometry fragment spectrum of the RPB1 peptide

Article Snippet: Materials & experimental systems n/a Involved in the study Antibodies Eukaryotic cell lines Palaeontology and archaeology Animals and other organisms Human research participants Clinical data Dual use research of concern Methods n/a Involved in the study ChIP-seq Flow cytometry MRI-based neuroimaging Antibodies Antibodies used F-12 Pol II antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-55492; anti-mouse HRP conjugate, Abcam, ab5870 Validation Mouse monoclonal antibody to RNA polymerase II subunit A.

Techniques: In Vitro, Mass Spectrometry

Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by Bio-Rad imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.

Journal: Molecular and cellular endocrinology

Article Title: SDHB and SDHD silenced pheochromocytoma spheroids respond differently to tumour microenvironment and their aggressiveness is inhibited by impairing stroma metabolism.

doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111594

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Characterization of stable SDHB and SDHD silenced cell lines. (A) Representative blots of the expression of mitochondrial SDHA, B and D subunits. (B) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands, performed by Bio-Rad imaging and analysis software (Quantity One), showed significant differences in the SDHB and SDHD subunit expression levels in SDHB (light grey) and in SDHD silenced cells (dark grey) respectively, compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent preparations ± SD, ***p < 0.001. (C) Representative traces of SDH enzymatic activity measured in cell homogenates. The silenced SDHB and SDHD cells (dotted and continuous lines, respectively) showed a similar decrease of the SDH activity, significantly different compared with Wt (dashed line). (D) Histogram represents the SDH activity expressed as the percentages. SDHB and SDHD silenced cells (light and dark grey, respectively) showed a significantly decreased of SDH activity compared to Wt (black). Bars are the means of three independent experiments (each of them conducted in duplicate samples) ± SD, ***p < 0.01. (E) The bar graph represents the means of intracellular succinate/fumarate ratio ± SD, measured by GC/MS, in three independent experiments with two replicates. SDHB silenced cells (light grey) showed a significant increase of the metabolites ratio compared with both Wt (black) and to SDHD silenced cells (dark grey), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (F) Representative immunoblot of HIF1α expression in Wt, SDHB and SDHD silenced cells. (G) Optical density analysis of western blot bands. Actin im munoblots was used as loading control. For all the analyses One-way ANOVA post-test Bonferroni was used.

Article Snippet: Bound antibodies were detected using ECL reagents (Immobilon) and analysed with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System (Quantity One) for dedicated chemiluminescent image acquisition.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Imaging, Software, Activity Assay, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Control